A Misspent Youth...
Prior Articles
- Get Ready...Get Set...
- Sudden Money
- A Welcome Life Raft
- Paying Income Taxes?
- Good News
- Flight to Safety
- Risk is Real
- A Good One...
- Who Knows?
- Going "To the Mattresses"?
- A Good Thing
- How Long?
- Now This Is What I Have Been Talking About
- How New Laws Actually Play Out
- When They Know, They Want
- "Cash is King" Oh Really?
- Trusts, Fees, and TAXES
- Is It What You Bargained For?
- Christmas Spirit
- Guaranteed Payments?
- What Happens When You Die?
- Constructive Receipt
- Send Us Another Windfall .
- Requirement IQ
- The Test of Time
- Can I Get A Mulligan?
- It's Easy . . . If You're Paul
- Do The Right Thing
- Bulls, Bears and Claimants
- "Attention, Settlement Shoppers . . . "
- Why Structures Work
- The Department of Homeland Security and my Uncle Jerry
- But Why Do They Blow the Money?
- The Nine Lives of Bob
- Section 104(a) (2) Declared Unconstitutional?!
- "Destructive Receipt"
- Economic Losses
- New Leverage on Medicaid Liens
Those of you who know me well have no doubt heard some of the tales of my misspent youth. In fact, I’ve written about a few of them in this very publication. The moral of these stories is usually: “Don’t do what Frank did or you will find yourself up close and personal with your local EMT”. The mistakes I made along the way resulted in some interesting scars and a few now-funny stories. Recently, though, I saw a young woman make a mistake that though will leave no physical mark, but will hurt a lot more in the end.
“Betty” was involved in an accident while a minor but she turned 18 in July of this year. Working with her parents, we designed a nice settlement plan designed to allow her to maximize her eligibility for financial aid while enjoying the tax free benefits of a structured settlement.
Remember that the reason a structured settlement is not taxable is that you do not own or have any rights to the assets backing the plan. Until the check arrives at your door (or EFT shows up in your bank account), you own nada. Combined with good design work, this construct can result in a person having substantial assets established for their benefit but still take advantage of any financial aid they might otherwise qualify for. Eligibility for several forms of college aid depends on the level of assets held by the student or their family; if you have too much money you do not qualify. We had explained this to Betty’s family and offered the following plan;
Monthly stipend while attending college: $ 300 per month for four years certain beginning on her 18th birthday.
Lump Sum to help pay off student loans: $ 60,000 paid after five years.
This plan provides Betty with a monthly income to offset expenses while attending college, but is not so large that it would accumulate and potentially disqualify her. When declaration forms need completing, she would honestly have little in the way of assets to declare. The whole basis for the monthly stipend is to relieve Betty of having to work and thereby enable her to apply more of her time toward her studies. The $60,000 lump sum payment is designed to pay off any student loans she may have taken out and to help her get started with her postgraduate life. The plan guarantees Betty will receive $74,400 in tax free benefits at a cost of only $61,920.
Betty’s parents saw the merit in our plan. They understood that by taking the settlement in cash and putting it in the bank they would diminish Betty’s eligibility for financial aid as they would have to declare the asset of $60,000 on her financial aid form. Everyone being satisfied with the plan, we funded the plan and began preparing closing documents. Unfortunately, …Betty turned 18 before the paperwork was complete.
Now an emancipated adult and legally out from under her parents’ thumbs, Betty had other ideas of what to do with her new found “fortune”. With 18 years of vast experience she rejected the structure and insisted on receiving a lump sum of cash. Everyone -her mother, her attorney, even the claim representative - tried to get Betty to change her mind. No way. The plan was scrapped.
Anyone care to take a guess at how long that money lasts? I suppose Betty was simply doing her part to stimulate the economy and that salespeople at the local malls and car dealerships will be thankful.
It is a well-documented fact that one of the least likely age groups to accept structured settlements are people ages 18-30. It’s not impossible to show them the benefits, but you have to listen carefully with this group. They have as yet shouldered few economic burdens but can’t help being affected by an astounding barrage of multi-media consumerism.
To have any chance for success with this group you must generally get the new car out of the way with an immediate cash payment. After that, they will often respond favorably to lump sums for down payment on a house and setting some amount aside for retirement (but not too much) in the distant, distant future. Most will never have heard of “tax-free” or understand its impact until you explain it to them. The quicker ones will enjoy feeling smart versus their unsophisticated (and ignorant) friends.
It’s not easy with this group, but it can be done. Unfortunately for Betty, she reached the magical age of 18 right on top of one of the biggest financial decisions she will ever have to make. At that age it’s easy to get it wrong - and she did.
Do you have a case where the claimant would be better off by not having to declare a large sum of cash? Do college expenses loom in the near future? Show them how to handle this right. Call Frank C. Kilcoyne, CSSC at 800-544-5533. I am here to help.